FREE DNS zone migration with NO limit on the number of zones!
*Works with standard zone files
Cloud DNS is the most cost-effective way to manage your domain names. You can use it with Free DNS or Premium DNS, depending on your needs. Our Cloud DNS service provides up to 10,000% uptime Service Level Agreement (SLA). And as your needs expand, you can upgrade at any time. The price is automatically recalculated and you don't need to pay upfront.
ClouDNS holds the #1 spot for raw DNS performance according to DNSPerf.
With unmatched speed and precisely built infrastructure, we outperform the biggest names in the industry.
*As of May 2025, ranked #1 for raw performance by DNSPerf.
But hereās the legal twist: Ratoff didnāt just let Casino Royale go. He had negotiated a clause that gave him a perpetual, reversionary interest in the underlying film rights to the entire Bond literary seriesāprovided he could get a film into production within a set timeframe. When he failed, the rights didnāt return cleanly to Fleming. Instead, they entered a strange purgatory. By 1960, Ratoff still held a tangled web of contractual claims. The critical moment came in early 1961. Fleming, now facing a tax crisis in Britain, was desperate to sell the Bond rights to a pair of Canadian producers named Harry Saltzman and Albert R. Broccoli. However, Broccoliās lawyers discovered the Ratoff clause. Any legitimate Bond film required Ratoffās signatureāor his legal surrender.
In the mid-1950s, Ian Flemingās James Bond novels were cult hits in Britain but commercial obscurities in the United States. Fleming, desperate for American dollars and screen exposure, had been trying to sell the film rights for years. Hollywood saw Bond as a relic of a bygone empireātoo stiff, too British, and too unbelievable.
Ratoff, by this time, was in failing health (he would die of leukemia in December 1960, just before the final deal was inkedāhis estate handled the closing). He had produced no Bond films. He had no studio backing. He was, by all accounts, tired and ill. He also fundamentally misunderstood the property. Ratoff reportedly told friends that Flemingās books were āsilly, sex-obsessed nonsenseā that would never work as movies.
But hereās the legal twist: Ratoff didnāt just let Casino Royale go. He had negotiated a clause that gave him a perpetual, reversionary interest in the underlying film rights to the entire Bond literary seriesāprovided he could get a film into production within a set timeframe. When he failed, the rights didnāt return cleanly to Fleming. Instead, they entered a strange purgatory. By 1960, Ratoff still held a tangled web of contractual claims. The critical moment came in early 1961. Fleming, now facing a tax crisis in Britain, was desperate to sell the Bond rights to a pair of Canadian producers named Harry Saltzman and Albert R. Broccoli. However, Broccoliās lawyers discovered the Ratoff clause. Any legitimate Bond film required Ratoffās signatureāor his legal surrender.
In the mid-1950s, Ian Flemingās James Bond novels were cult hits in Britain but commercial obscurities in the United States. Fleming, desperate for American dollars and screen exposure, had been trying to sell the film rights for years. Hollywood saw Bond as a relic of a bygone empireātoo stiff, too British, and too unbelievable.
Ratoff, by this time, was in failing health (he would die of leukemia in December 1960, just before the final deal was inkedāhis estate handled the closing). He had produced no Bond films. He had no studio backing. He was, by all accounts, tired and ill. He also fundamentally misunderstood the property. Ratoff reportedly told friends that Flemingās books were āsilly, sex-obsessed nonsenseā that would never work as movies.